Category: Psychology

  • Victimology is an important area of the criminal justice system that we should n

    Victimology is an important area of the criminal justice system that we should n

    Victimology is an important area of the criminal justice system that we should not forget, but it gets less attention than other areas within forensic psychology. When criminal cases and the perpetrators of victim crimes are viewed and scrutinized in the news, media, or documentaries, the primary focus is often on the perpetrator of the crime. This discussion will draw attention to the victims by discussing the impact the crime had on them, as well as how they are affected by the criminal justice system.
    After completing the readings for this week, please answer the following.
    *Provide an overview of victimology for a reader with no knowledge of the concept.
    *How has society’s perspective of victims evolved over time?
    *Compare and contrast the perspectives of retributive and restorative justice?
    *Does one of these perspectives offer more satisfaction to victims? If so, why?
    References
    Constanzo, M., & Krauss, D. (2021). Forensic and legal psychology: Psychological science applied to law (4th ed.). Worth Publishers. (Chapter 11)
    Mawby, R. I., & Walklate, S. (1994). Critical victimology: International perspectives. SAGE Publications, Inc. Chapter 1: “Perspectives on Victimology” and Chapter 5: “Immediate Help for the Victims of Crime”
    Malsch, M., & Kaptein, H. (2017). Crime, victims and justice: Essays on principles and practice. Routledge. Chapter 1: “Doubts on the Upsurge of the Victim’s Role in Criminal Law” and Chapter 2: “Gearing Justice Action to Victim Satisfaction Contrasting Two Justice Philosophies: Retribution and Redress”

  • Description from the teacher: In this exercise, you will identify the different

    Description from the teacher:
    In this exercise, you will identify the different

    Description from the teacher:
    In this exercise, you will identify the different personality traits and research methods available by assessing your personality.

  • Before participating in this week’s discussion, be sure to have watched both of

    Before participating in this week’s discussion, be sure to have watched both of

    Before participating in this week’s discussion, be sure to have watched both of the following videos:
    Autism Recovery Network. (2022, Oct. 13). Prompting- Parental Training 20. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/vDDsQdQnKCI
    Douglas, M. (2020, Sept. 15). Discrete Trial Training [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fcnEZC2FOw
    Choose one of the videos and respond to the following:
    What evidenced-based intervention strategy did you observe being used in the video clip? What is effective? How so? If not, why?
    Share at least one other evidence-based intervention strategy that could be used along with the one you viewed in the video and why you would choose it.
    In your reply posts, find a post that you either agree or disagree with, and explain why.

  • In preparing your assignment, identify a scenario, an interaction that you have

    In preparing your assignment, identify a scenario, an interaction that you have

    In preparing your assignment, identify a scenario, an interaction that you have observed or encountered. Describe briefly the interaction and then analyze it in terms of what you have learned about self-concept, self-esteem, self-presentation, and self-efficacy. Remember to cite the peer-reviewed material you identified in the Study 1 or another peer-reviewed article of your choice. Use this source material to explain how you interpret the interaction you have described. How do these self-system concepts explain behavior, thoughts, and feelings of individuals and groups?
    Criteria for paper:
    Demonstrate an understanding of issues related to the concepts of self-esteem, self-concept, self-presentation, and self-efficacy.
    Critically analyze research related to concepts of self-esteem, self-concept, self-presentation, and self-efficacy.
    Use real-life scenarios to apply the concepts of self-esteem, self-concept, self-presentation, and self-efficacy social contexts.
    Other Requirements
    Your paper should meet the following requirements:
    Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    APA format: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
    Length of paper: 3–6 typed double-spaced pages for the text of the paper, not including the cover page or appendices.
    Submit your paper as a Word document in the assignment area.
    Criteria:
    Analyze research related to concepts of self-esteem, self-concept, self-presentation, and self-efficacy.
    Apply the concepts of self-esteem, self-concept, self-presentation, and self-efficacy social contexts using real-life scenarios.
    Demonstrate an understanding of issues related to the concepts of self-esteem, self-concept, self-presentation, and self-efficacy.
    Communicate through writing that is concise, balanced, and logically organized.
    Communicate through writing that applies current APA style and formatting and that conforms to all assignment instructions.

  • Popper has criticized the traditional approach to testing scientific theories by

    Popper has criticized the traditional approach to testing scientific theories by

    Popper has criticized the traditional approach to testing scientific theories by suggesting that confirmation is not an appropriate strategy for gathering evidence in support of a scientific theory. i. Explain Popper’s reasons for holding this view. ii. Present his alternative to it and explain the differences between the more traditional view and this alternative. iii. Explain the difference between the “naive” and the “sophisticated” version of falsificationism including in your answer the relevance of Lakotos’ “protective belt”. iv. What is the difference between a “progressive” and “degenerating problem shift” in a research program and how does this difference give credibility to the notion that a scientist who continues to defend a theory that has generated hypotheses that have later been falsified may be motivated by rational criteria (Popper and Lakotos) rather than psychological or sociological criteria Kuhn? v. Explain why Popper believes that psychoanalysis could not, in its present form, be a scientific theory. vi. (optional) If one were to adopt Thomas Kuhn’s (1962) earlier approach, is there any argument that might be utilized to defend the idea that psychoanalytic theory may be considered a scientific discipline? If so, state and evaluate what that argument is. Would Kuhn’s later revised theory (1970) reject psychoanalytic theory as scientific (explain)? Write an essay 5-7 pages, double spaced, times new roman, use 2 sources outside and cite them in APA format.

  • Discussion Topic: Week 1 Journal EntryWeek 1 Journal Entry Once a week, you wil

    Discussion Topic: Week 1 Journal EntryWeek 1 Journal Entry
    Once a week, you wil

    Discussion Topic: Week 1 Journal EntryWeek 1 Journal Entry
    Once a week, you will write a brief journal entry (1-2 paragraphs) explaining how a recent social interaction demonstrates a concept discussed in lecture. Each entry is worth a maximum of 5 points. Points will be awarded based on how clearly you described the social interaction and how accurately you related it to a social psychology concept. Journal entries will be made – and available for others to view – on this discussion forum. Each will be due at 11:59PM on Sunday night between Weeks 1-10. Click on the “Reply” button below to begin your entry.
    Example journal entry:
    Today as I was driving into work, a car cut me off on I-5 and almost caused me to rearend him. I was furious. I drove up next to him to look into his car and saw exactly what I was expecting: a young, a male driver. I immediately thought, “what an asshole!” My assumption that his behavior (cutting me off) was a product of his disposition (being a young man), rather than his situation illustrates the fundamental attribution error discussed in class. Perhaps he is not an asshole, but was late for work. We are more likely to commit the fundamental attribution error when explaining others’ behavior, so I bet that if I were the one to have cut somebody off, I would have more quickly considered the impact of the situation.

  • Writer must have access to free textbooks/articles because i do not have access

    Writer must have access to free textbooks/articles because i do not have access

    Writer must have access to free textbooks/articles because i do not have access to the ones needed for this assignment. Please see attachment for full instructions.

  • Introduction Imagine that you are a professional psychologist, working in your s

    Introduction
    Imagine that you are a professional psychologist, working in your s

    Introduction
    Imagine that you are a professional psychologist, working in your specialization. You are tasked with creating professional development for an interdisciplinary team of professionals in your workplace, on how theories, principles, and evidence-based best practices of cognitive and affective psychology can be used to help people in your work context.
    You will be working to help improve a specific concern for a specific population that may be addressed in your line of work. Over three assignments in this course (Week 3, Week 5, and Week 7), you’ll explore the concern from cognitive and affective perspectives, and then will present the information you have gathered to a specific audience of your coworkers, and make recommendations for professional practice based on the information. The progression is as follows:
    Week 3 – Paper – cognitive factors for a specific concern and create an informational handout for the population.
    Week 5 – Paper – affective factors for a specific concern.
    Week 7 – Presentation for coworkers or interdisciplinary team.
    This week you will create a paper focused on cognitive factors. Cognitive factors to consider may include:
    Perception.
    Consciousness.
    Attention.
    Memory.
    How knowledge is represented, manipulated, and organized.
    How language is acquired and processed.
    Problem solving and creativity.
    Decision-making and reasoning.
    Human or artificial intelligence.
    You do not need to cover all of these topics in your paper. Consider the cognitive factors that may play a prominent role in the concern, or those that you may find helpful in working toward a solution or improvement in the concern.
    Assignment Instructions
    Part 1
    For this assignment, select a problem or concern for a specific population or group with whom your specialization works or would work that can be addressed by consideration of cognitive and affective (emotional) factors.
    In your paper, describe the concern, describe the population, and describe the setting. For example, you might be working in a school with children who experience school anxiety or are targets of bullying, or you might be working in a mental health clinic with those who have personality disorders or who suffer from chronic depression. These are just examples from many possibilities. Choose a population and concern of interest to you and your future goals as a practitioner.
    Once you describe the setting, concern, and population, explain theories that can be applied to understanding and addressing the concern. These may be learning theories, psychological theories, biological theories, or others. Apply the theories to create a better understanding of cognitive factors that may be relevant for the population in reference to the concern or problem.
    Next, explore research on the subject. Search for scholarly articles that address cognitive factors related to the concern or problem. Present research findings from the articles and then apply those findings to a better understanding of the population and concern. What was researched? What did the researchers find? How can it be applied to the population and concern you are addressing within your professional scope of practice?
    In your paper, also address the diversity that may exist within the population with whom you are working. The diversity may reflect, for example, going on our previous examples, diversity within a student body, or clinical population, or based on age, culture, gender identity, range of abilities within a certain area, demographic location, or others.
    Make sure that your sources are properly cited and referenced according to the current edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.
    Check your spelling, grammar, and flow and cohesion of ideas.
    This part of your assignment submission aligns with the following rubric criteria:
    Apply theory to understanding cognitive factors related to a specific concern for a specific population.
    Apply research findings to understanding cognitive factors related to a specific concern.
    Describe diversity within the specific population served.
    Address assignment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    Format paper, citations, and references using APA style with few errors.
    Part 2
    Once you have completed your paper, create a 1–2 page handout or fact sheet for the population of interest about the concern.
    Provide some of the professional information that you have gathered in a way that is appropriate for the audience. Provide information and resources that may benefit the audience.
    Attach the handout along with your completed paper.
    This part of your assignment submission aligns with the following rubric criteria:
    Create a handout addressing a topic of concern designed for the population served.
    Address assignment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    Submission Requirements
    Length of Paper: 5–6 double-spaced pages of content, in addition to an APA-style title page and reference list.
    Length of Handout: 1–2 pages, as appropriate, to convey the information and desired format of your handout to your chosen audience.
    Communication: Must be clear, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, and with good organization.
    Writing style: APA expectations for scholarly writing include the use of third-person narrative, unless it is awkward to do so. However, because you are talking about yourself in this paper, you may write in the first person.
    APA formatting: References and citations should be formatted according to APA style and format. Refer to the Writing CenterLinks to an external site. for guidance. Include a title page, abstract, and reference list.
    Submitting your work: Once you are satisfied with your assignment and have made all necessary revisions, submit your assignment no later than 11:59 p.m. CST Sunday.
    Competencies Measured
    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:
    Competency 2: Integrate theories, principles, and concepts in the application of cognitive and affective psychology.
    Apply theory to understanding cognitive factors related to a specific concern for a specific population.
    Competency 3: Apply evidence-based findings from cognitive and affective psychological research to professional practice.
    Apply research findings to understanding cognitive factors related to a specific concern.
    Competency 5: Analyze theories and principles of cognitive and affective psychology in relationship to practice with diverse populations.
    Describe diversity within the specific population served.
    Create a handout addressing a topic of concern designed for the population served.
    Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.
    Address assignment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    Format paper, citations, and references using APA style with few errors.

  • For this assignment, you will consider an interaction you had with another perso

    For this assignment, you will consider an interaction you had with another perso

    For this assignment, you will consider an interaction you had with another person over the last few days, and complete the four parts outlined below. You can reference Skinner (1957) p. 38 for an example Speaker-Listener diagram as a support for completing this assignment. Create a document with each part of the assignment clearly indicated (you can choose to draw your diagram by hand and include a photo of it in your assignment OR create it electronically). (A) Once you have decided on an interaction to utilize for your assignment, you will diagram this interaction as in Figure 1.1 (from Ming et al (2023), shown below), showing both: (1) the scenario/script and (2) the Speaker/Listener diagram including the interlocking contingencies as sources of antecedent and consequential control within these interactions. (B) Identify the relevant motivating operations for the speak and/or listener in this example. (C) Describe the role of audience as a controlling variable in this example. (D) Notice how your behavior influenced the other’s behavior. If you changed one of your responses, how would that change the whole interaction?