Post a response to the following:
Review the program evaluation tools provided b
Post a response to the following:
Review the program evaluation tools provided by SAMHSA, the CDC, the WHO, or other resources. Describe an approach you would take toward evaluating the programs, policies, and procedures in a particular setting. What challenges do you expect in collecting the necessary materials and information from the stakeholders?
Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
You are an experienced BCBA who is consulting at a startup ABA company. About si
You are an experienced BCBA who is consulting at a startup ABA company. About six months ago, the owner asked you to design a shaping procedure for staff attendance. Good news! Your plan was effective! Staff attendance significantly improved in months two through four and reached desired levels in month five. However, in the last 3-4 weeks, the data reflects an increase in staff call outs. The owner will be opening a second location in about six months from now. They would like for attendance to return to the improved levels of month five and for that improved attendance to carry over to the new location.
Discussion
Please complete your assigned readings and respond to the following:
Detail three approaches you could incorporate into the shaping procedure that would increase the probability of the desired attendance occurring in the new location, as well as future clinic locations.
Explain how these three approaches increase generalization of modified behavior.
Discuss why increasing generalization also increases the probability of response maintenance.
Explain how technician evaluations align with the guiding principles for promoting generalized outcomes.
Illustrate how the programming for generalization and maintenance are aligned with the BACB Ethics Code in maximizing client outcomes in a given setting and responsibility to supervisees and trainees.
Hello! The assignment have to be free of plagiarism and dont use AI because it c
Hello! The assignment have to be free of plagiarism and dont use AI because it can be track.
The assignment have to be 2 pages of written work and 1 page of system-wide map of the hierarchy of the various levels within the system.
You can create the research on Review district and school websites in New Jersey.
I will upload the capella compassion code
Overview
When working within a school district, it is important to know and understand all levels within the system from leadership down to the school and classroom level, all the way to the individual students receiving services. It will be important for you as a consultant to know and understand the roles and positions that will be essential for you to work directly with, as well as the roles and positions in leadership above you in the system. Attaining agreement for consultative behavior analytic support is essential at multiple levels within that system. In most cases, behavior analysts are the experts regarding behavior support and evidence-based instructional delivery; however, if we do not present our expertise respectfully, we risk damaging the opportunity to share our knowledge with others. This assignment will help you investigate the systems you will be working in and reflect on the cultural and relational aspects of the client/consultant relationship.
Preparation
To prepare for this assignment, complete the following:
Research the structure and culture of a local school district by doing one of the following:
Review district and school websites.
Review the Capella Compassion Code [PDF] Download Capella Compassion Code [PDF]. You will need to refer to the Capella Compassion Code when discussing the behavior analyst’s role in the school district.
Instructions
Please include the following information in your paper:
Create a system-wide map of the hierarchy of the various levels within the system, from leadership levels to the classroom and the student. (Suggestions: Use MS Visio or MS Word.)
Visit Microsoft Azure for EducationLinks to an external site. to learn how to access MS Visio for free. To learn more about using MS Visio, refer to the Tools and Resources section.
Describe the systems within a local school district.
Describe key cultural aspects that will help you understand how to attain agreement with leaders, teachers, and students within the district.
What is the level of inclusion of students with disabilities who are receiving special education services?
Are the parents heavily involved with the district?
Do they have a heavy focus on STEAM/STEM?
Do they have an IB program they are proud of?
Do they feature athletics or arts in their district?
What is the local average household income or poverty level of the school?
What percentage of children receive free or reduced lunch?
What percentage of the population are non-native English speakers or do not speak English as a primary language at home?
Reflect on and discuss your (the behavior analyst’s) role in the school system, as well as how this relates to compassionate practice of a behavior analyst.
What activities would be included in your role?
How will you incorporate compassionate practice into your work?
Which elements of the Capella Compassion Code would be applied in this setting?
Describe strategies you would use to build rapport at the beginning of the professional relationship.
With which key roles will you need to build rapport and collaborate?
Submit your paper and your chart to the assignment area. You may submit them separately or in one document.
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Use current APA style and formatting, paying particular attention to citations and references. Refer to Evidence and APALinks to an external site. for citing and referencing tips.
Length: 2–3 double-spaced pages in addition to the system map, not including the title page or reference page.
References: A minimum of four scholarly or professional resources in addition to the textbook.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze consultative approaches used in educational settings.
Describe the role of a behavior analyst within the school system.
Describe strategies for building rapport.
Competency 2: Apply collaborative skills in educational settings.
Create a system map of a school district.
Describe the systems within a school district.
Describe cultural aspects that are important to understand to collaborate with leaders, teachers, and students within the district.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.
Demonstrate compliance with current APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.
Certification by the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) as a board cert
Certification by the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) as a board certified behavior analyst (BCBA) is different and a separate qualification than licensure of behavior analysts at the individual state level. How behavior analysts practice in schools is determined by licensure laws and regulations, depending on the state. Licensure holds more power than certification and impacts the way in which you can practice. This assignment will help you discover if licensure exists in your state and how that affects how behavior analysts practice in schools.
Preparation
To prepare for this assignment, complete the following:
Research the licensure requirements for a behavior analyst in your state. Visit U.S. Licensure of Behavior Analysts Links to an external site. to get started.
If your state does not require licensure, research the requirements in a nearby state.
Review the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, or IDEA Links to an external site..
Research your state’s special education laws.
Research any other requirements that may exist at the state level that would affect a behavior analyst’s practice in public school settings.
Instructions
Create a presentation as a means of organizing the following information:
BACB Certification and State Licensure
Describe at least 2–3 differences and similarities between BACB certification and state licensure.
Discuss the state licensure requirements for behavior analysts in your state.
If licensure does exist, what are the requirements to become licensed? What board or council has governance over the behavior analyst license? What does the license allow you to do? What are the limitations? What are the pros and cons of having a licensure requirement at the state level?
If there is no licensure requirement in your state, research a nearby state and answer the questions above.
Explain how licensure requirements, or the absence of licensure, affect a behavior analyst’s practice in public school settings. What limitations exist if any?
Identify and discuss any other specific guidance at the state level (licensure board, state professional association of behavior analysis, state department of education) that affect a behavior analyst’s practice in public school settings.
Special Education Law
Explain the role of the behavior analyst on an individualized education program (IEP) team according to the federal law (IDEA).
Explain how any specific state special education laws affect a behavior analyst’s practice in public school settings.
Use the Notes section to write out a script for your presentation.
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Use current APA style and formatting for citations and references. Refer to Evidence and APA Links to an external site. for citing and referencing tips.
Length: 8–10 slides, not including the title slide or reference slide.
References: A minimum of four credible professional resources.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:
Competency 3: Identify laws and regulations centered around behavior-analytic consultation in educational settings.
Describe differences and similarities between BACB certification and state licensure.
Discuss state licensure requirements for behavior analysts in a particular state.
Explain how licensure requirements affect a behavior analyst’s practice in a public school setting.
Explain how federal and state special education law affect a behavior analyst’s practice in a public school setting.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
Create a well-organized presentation with a clear purpose, addressing the appropriate audience in discipline-specific language and terminology.
Apply APA formatting to references.
I have attached the paper summary that needs to be included in this paper. Pleas
I have attached the paper summary that needs to be included in this paper. Please use those two sources plus one additional source.
The paper should demonstrate the ability to evaluate, analyze and synthesize information from multiple sources. The main body of the paper must be a minimum of 750 words in length, excluding the cover page and the reference page. Other sections, such as the cover page and the reference page are part of the paper format. Use your text as your main source. You do not need to provide any additional sources. The paper should be submitted in Word, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins and font consistent with current APA guidelines. All sources should be included in the list of references. The paper is worth 175 points. It is due by 11:59 pm CT Sunday to the appropriate Dropbox folder.
Activity 4: Complete Section Data Collection
Activity Description
Submit Researc
Activity 4: Complete Section Data Collection
Activity Description
Submit Research Data Collection Procedures: Submit Research Data Collection Procedures:
The candidate will provide a concise but thorough description of the steps used to collect data from the participants. Describe any recruitment processes and/or communication; describe the informed consent process; and note the data collection schedule. If interviews are conducted indicate the length, the number, where conducted, and stipulate how they will be recorded. For surveys, describe the procedures for how they will be distributed and collected. Include all other procedures and processes needed to replicate the study. If archival data are used, describe the process by which the data will be procured, selected, and utilized. For any other methods of data collection provide a complete description of all processes. Note IRB Approval is required for all types of studies.
Review the Doctoral Project Handbook, the Doctoral Project template, IRB Policies and Procedures and application.
Submit paper describing all data collection procedures. Include recruitment letter and consent form as an appendix. Paper should be 2 to 3 pages for discussion or data collection procedures and additional pages for each type of recruitment correspondence and consent form.
Activity Outcomes
Create a data collection, sample population, and data analysis section appropriate to the study design.
Grading Scale
Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory
Once a week, you will write a brief journal entry (1-2 paragraphs) explaining ho
Once a week, you will write a brief journal entry (1-2 paragraphs) explaining how a recent social interaction demonstrates a concept discussed in lecture. Each entry is worth a maximum of 5 points. Points will be awarded based on how clearly you described the social interaction and how accurately you related it to a social psychology concept. Journal entries will be made – and available for others to view – on this discussion forum. Each will be due at 11:59PM on Sunday night between Weeks 1-10. Click on the “Reply” button below to begin your entry.
Example journal entry:
Today as I was driving into work, a car cut me off on I-5 and almost caused me to rearend him. I was furious. I drove up next to him to look into his car and saw exactly what I was expecting: a young, a male driver. I immediately thought, “what an asshole!” My assumption that his behavior (cutting me off) was a product of his disposition (being a young man), rather than his situation illustrates the fundamental attribution error discussed in class. Perhaps he is not an asshole, but was late for work. We are more likely to commit the fundamental attribution error when explaining others’ behavior, so I bet that if I were the one to have cut somebody off, I would have more quickly considered the impact of the situation.
LINK FOR CASE:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/362/402/
Discuss the
LINK FOR CASE:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/362/402/
Discuss the case of Dusky v. United States PDF (1960) with your classmates. Using the appropriate terminology, examine the background, participants, and historical significance of the case in relation to competency assessments used in today’s forensic practice. In your discussion, provide the psychometrics of two competency assessment tools that you would utilize in a competency evaluation.
Activity 5: Describe Analysis Procedures & Ethical Assurances
Activity Descripti
Activity 5: Describe Analysis Procedures & Ethical Assurances
Activity Description
Write the Analysis Procedures Section: The candidate describes the analysis of the data that will be performed as well as the specific steps taken. It is important to reference a research methods book to detail this process. Researcher bias, validity, reliability and other research factors should be addressed as appropriate. Note, it is recommended to use the current, applicable PRISMA checklist for evidence synthesis studies (either PRISMA-2020 or PRISMA-ScR for most studies). Information can be found on the PRISMA Links to an external site.
Links to an external site.Links to an external site. website.
Write the Ethical Assurances Section: The candidate confirms the study will receive approval from the University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior to data collection. If the risk to participants is greater than minimal, discuss the relevant ethical issues and how they will be addressed. Describe how confidentiality will be protected including storage of materials. Describe the role of the researcher in the study. Discuss relevant issues, including biases as well as personal and professional experiences with the topic that may influence the study. Present the strategies that will be (proposal) or were (manuscript) used to prevent these biases and experiences from influencing the analysis or findings.
Submit paper describing the data analysis process for your study. Paper should be 3-5 pages in length.
Activity Outcomes
Validate the study with established methods and published studies.
Grading Scale
Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory
===========================
http://www.prisma-statement.org/
Activity 3: Complete Section Instrumentation
Activity Description
Identify and d
Activity 3: Complete Section Instrumentation
Activity Description
Identify and describe the research protocols or instrumentation for your study. Provide a description of the instruments or protocols that will be used such as surveys, interviews, observations, or artifacts. All protocol questions or criteria should be clearly linked to the literature presented in chapter two, your research questions, and your theoretical or conceptual framework.
Instrumentation should align with your 3-5 Research Questions. Your Research Questions should reflect the methods approach you will use for your study, which are evidence synthesis, qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Describe all protocols to be used in data collections. All instrumentation should be presented as an appendix to your study.
For qualitative studies that involve developing interview questions, it will be necessary to show how each interview question provides answers to the research questions. First, list the research question and then the interview question/s developed to answer the research question. Follow this process for each research question.
Synthesis of Evidence that involves approaches such as PRISMA will include presentation of the evaluation tool associated with the approach. Add the PRISMA or other synthesis of evidence tools to the appendices. Evidence of synthesis studies that involve standardized protocols such as PRISMA, or models like PICO, will include a presentation of applicable checklists, diagrams and procedures associated with the approach. All instruments that will be utilized must be listed in the appendices.
For qualitative studies, the interview guide, which is comprised of descriptive information and interview questions, must be reviewed by an expert in the field as a validity check. The expert must be identified in the instrumentation section with notation on the evidence of expert level knowledge such as publications on the topic or specific practice experience. In general, the Chair will assist with an expert on the topic within the University, however there may be situations where an outside expert is necessary. The instrument will be included in the appendices. Make sure to include demographic data questions on the instrument as that will be needed for chapter four.
Quantitative studies will provide a description of the scale or measure that will be used with the information that show the reliability and validity of the tool. All tools must be listed in the appendices with a letter of permission or statement by the author that the document or instrument is in the public domain. Make sure to include demographic data questions on the instrument as that will be needed for chapter four.
Submit paper with all instruments that will be used in your study as an appendix and include a detailed description of the instrumentation and address validity and reliability. Paper should be 2 to 3 pages for description and additional pages for each protocol.
Activity Outcomes
Synthesize the ethical dimensions of various research methods.
Grading Scale
Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory