Watch Positivism, verification and falsifiability videos.
Review Walker and Ava
Watch Positivism, verification and falsifiability videos.
Review Walker and Avant concept analysis video.
Submit your definitions showing understanding of positivism, verification and falsifiability.
you can submit them in a word document.
Write a brief essay decription and rubric to align with prviuos assignmentprev
Write a brief essay decription and rubric to align with prviuos assignmentpreviuos assignment and rubric
72-year-old client enters the emergency room and reports shortness of
breath. Th
72-year-old client enters the emergency room and reports shortness of
breath. The client has a two pack per day smoking history for 50 years.
The paint tales she clin waf dreat had progres a worse dover
Has a history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
• Admitting Diagnosis: Shortness of breath, acute exacerbation, COPD. 1200
• Vital signs
• B/P: 173/92
• Pulse: 123
Respirations: 39
: Ox saluten: 85% on room air
• Pain: 0/10
Lehne’s Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Providers and Physician Assis
Lehne’s Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Providers and Physician Assistants
Edition: 2nd
References can’t be over 5years old-need a total of 3 references
ALL WORK NEEDS TO BE ENTERED ON WORKSHEET TEMPLATE THAT WAS UPLOADED.
General Instructions
Explore current literature and clinical practice guidelines to complete the clinical treatment protocol template.
Complete the protocol outline template Links to an external site. to develop a protocol for asthma treatment. Use of the template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. See the rubric.
Provide references for your protocol at the bottom of the form where indicated. References should come from the following sources:
Asthma Clinical Practice Guideline
Course Textbook (for individual medication information)
Journal Articles from within the last five years as defined by program expectations.
Follow APA grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) may be used in this assignment.
First person should not be used within this assignment.
At least three scholarly references must be used for this assignment.
Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.
Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric).
Pharmacological Treatment
Correctly complete all blanks for the preferred and alternative medication for each step of therapy noted in the CPG.
List medications in order according to the CPG.
List generic medication names for each category.
Provide an in-text citation under the completed table.
Treatment Differences in Adults and Children
Correctly list the first line of initial pharmacologic treatment in step one; track one for asthmatic adults. (7a on the form)
Correctly list the first line of initial pharmacologic treatment in step one, track one for asthmatic children ages 6-11. (7b on the form)
Correctly list drug dose, route, frequency, instructions, precautions, drug cost, and education for adult and pediatric clients.
Provide in-text citations under the information for adults and pediatric clients.
Treatment Monitoring
List the physical assessments required for monitoring the first-line medications prescribed to adults for track one, step one.
List the pulmonary function tests required for monitoring the first-line medications prescribed to adults for track one, step one.
List the laboratory tests required for monitoring the first-line medications prescribed to adults for track one, step one.
Provide an in-text citation under the treatment monitoring section.
Treatment Failure
Describe how you will know that treatment is not working or needs to progress.
Describe the next step if treatment is not working or needs to progress.
Describe the indicators that would demonstrate that the client requires a higher level of care.
Provide an in-text citation under the treatment failure section.
Case Study 1 Scenario:
Client, Sarah Collins, has chronic kidney disease. She re
Case Study 1 Scenario:
Client, Sarah Collins, has chronic kidney disease. She receives dialysis twice a week. Today when Mrs. Collins arrives at the dialysis clinic, the nurse assesses Mrs. Collins and notes her blood pressure is 145/90 mm Hg and she has gained three pounds since her last visit. Mrs. Collins tells the nurse she was trying earlier to walk to her mailbox at the end of the driveway and couldn’t because she was out of breath. Mrs. Collins’ husband and 16-year-old grandson are at the clinic with her.
Case Study Analysis Assignment Outline:
The case study analysis paper should include the following sections with responses and rationales for all the prompts.
Introduction (3-5 paragraphs)
Provide an overview of the pathophysiology of the disease exhibited by the client. Include:
What additional assessment findings would you look for?
What lab abnormalities would you expect to see?
What diagnostics would you anticipate the healthcare team ordering?
Provide a rationale for your answers.
Implications for Self-Care (2-3 paragraphs)
Consider Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and describe where the client falls in that hierarchy and how this will impact care and healing.
How does this disease process impact the client’s and/or their care provider’s ability to care for themselves?
Identify two community resources available to support self-care management of the client.
Discuss both short-term and long-term care needs of the client, as well as the role of the professional nurse in facilitation.
Patient Education Strategy (2-3 paragraphs)
Identify 3-5 appropriate nursing interventions and teaching points for your client based on the pathophysiology and assessment findings.
Describe the educational strategies that should be incorporated when building a plan of care for your client.
Support with rationale.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration (2-3 paragraphs)
Identify 2-4 interdisciplinary team members who need to be included in the care of the client. Include rationale.
Consider the care the client will need while inpatient and upon discharge.
Consider nutrition, community services, and financial implications.
Economic & Quality Considerations (1 paragraph)
Discuss how ongoing accurate data collection of this specific client’s health status contributes to quality, cost-effective healthcare
Conclusion (1 paragraph)
Summarize the key concepts of this disease process and client case study scenario.
References
A minimum of three references should be used in this paper.
References should be no more than five years old.
One reference must be the required textbook for this course.
One reference must be from a peer-reviewed journal,
One reference must be from an authoritative website such as the CDC, NIH or Healthy People 2030.
Assignment Specifications:
Name the paper with a File Naming Protocol: When you save the paper, name it: LastName_NSG 3300_CaseStudyAnalysis_1.docx
Paper reflects clinical and professional client/cases, and no references to personal or family issues.
APA Formatting
All papers should be written in APA formatting. This paper should include:
Formal components, such as a title page, and APA formatting with an introductory and conclusion paragraph that summarizes the key concepts
APA-formatted level headings
APA margin, font, and paragraph spacing
Include page numbers
Appropriate in-text reference citations
A reference page, in correct APA format
BOOK ISBN-13: 9780323761550
Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to
Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.
Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.
In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.
To Prepare:
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.
Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.
Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.
Since our group project is due in a couple days, I wanted to send my outline sug
Since our group project is due in a couple days, I wanted to send my outline suggestion. If you all agree this would work, can we each take one of the points and work on it? Or does anyone else have any other suggestions? Our group project will apply Jean Watson’s Theory of Human Caring through the following sections:
topic
Overview of the theory and key concepts.
Develop an intervention (your capstone project),
** I will send you my assessme
Develop an intervention (your capstone project),
** I will send you my assessment 2 and you can define a problem from that)***as a solution to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined. Submit the proposed intervention to the faculty for review and approval. This solution needs to be implemented (shared) with your patient, family, or group. You are not to share your intervention with your patient, family, or group or move on to Assessment 5 before your faculty reviews/approves the solution you submit in Assessment 4. In a separate written deliverable, write a 5–7 page analysis of your intervention.
Expand All
Introduction
In your first three assessments, you applied new knowledge and insight gleaned from the literature, from organizational data, and from direct consultation with the patient, family, or group (and perhaps with subject matter and industry experts) to your assessment of the problem. You’ve examined the problem from the perspectives of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, policy, quality of care, patient safety, costs to the system and individual, technology, care coordination, and community resources. Now it’s time to turn your attention to proposing an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the problem.
Preparation
In this assessment, you’ll develop an intervention as a solution to the health problem you’ve defined. To prepare for the assessment, think about an appropriate intervention, based on your work in the preceding assessments, that will produce tangible, measurable results for the patient, family, or group. In addition, you might consider using a root cause analysis to explore the underlying reasons for a problem and as the basis for developing and implementing an action plan to address the problem. Some appropriate interventions include the following:
Creating an educational brochure.
Producing an educational voice-over PowerPoint presentation or video focusing on your topic.
Creating a teaching plan for your patient, family, or group.
Recommending work process or workflow changes addressing your topic.
Plan to spend at least 3 direct practicum hours working with the same patient, family, or group.
In addition, you may wish to complete the following:
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.
Conduct sufficient research of the scholarly and professional literature to inform your work and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.omplete this assessment in two parts: (a) develop an intervention as a solution to the problem and (b) submit your proposed intervention, with a written analysis, to your faculty for review and approval.
Part 1
Develop an intervention, as a solution to the problem, based on your assessment and supported by data and scholarly, evidence-based sources.
Incorporate relevant aspects of the following considerations that shaped your understanding of the problem:
Leadership.
Collaboration.
Communication.
Change management.
Policy.
Quality of care.
Patient safety.
Costs to the system and individual.
Technology.
Care coordination.
Community resources.
Part 2
Submit your proposed intervention to your faculty for review and approval.
In a separate written deliverable, write a 5–7 page analysis of your intervention.
Summarize the patient, family, or population problem.
Explain why you selected this problem as the focus of your project.
Explain why the problem is relevant to your professional practice and to the patient, family, or group.
In addition, address the requirements outlined below. These requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria for this assessment, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Define the role of leadership and change management in addressing the problem.
Explain how leadership and change management strategies influenced the development of your proposed intervention.
Explain how nursing ethics informed the development of your proposed intervention.
Include a copy of the intervention/solution/professional product.
Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with the patient, family, or group to improve outcomes associated with the problem.
Identify the patient, family, or group.
Discuss the benefits of gathering their input to improve care associated with the problem.
Identify best-practice strategies from the literature for effective communication and collaboration to improve outcomes.
Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies guided the development of your proposed intervention.
Cite the standards and/or policies that guided your work.
Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving outcomes for this problem.
Explain how your proposed intervention will improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual.
Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions.
Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.
Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization of community resources can be applied in addressing the problem.
Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions.
Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Format: Format the written analysis of your intervention using APA style. APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:
A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
Appropriate section headings.
Length: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page.
Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.
Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.
Portfolio Prompt: Save your intervention to your ePortfolio. After you complete your program, you may want to consider leveraging your portfolio as part of a job search or other demonstration of your academic and professional competencies.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.
Define the role of leadership and change management in addressing a patient, family, or population health problem and includes a copy of intervention/solution/professional product.
Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.
Explain how a proposed intervention to address a patient, family, or population health problem will improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual.
Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.
Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization of community resources can be applied in addressing a patient, family, or population health problem.
Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.
Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies guided the development of a proposed intervention.
Competency 6: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and population outcomes.
Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with a patient, family, or group to improve outcomes associated with a patient, family, or population health problem.
Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Please complete and submit a journal entry for each class session. Students will
Please complete and submit a journal entry for each class session. Students will submit journals
at the end of each class session. Participation grades will reflect completion of weekly journals. Please choose two topics from class to discuss. Choose two principles, concepts, etc. that had meaning for you from the class today. Fully explain why you chose each one and your reaction. Entries can include your visceral reaction, agreement or disagreement with discussion, questions, thoughtful insights, values challenged, etc.
Please write a 3-5 sentence paragraph about each of the two topics.
No citing needed
Individual Assignment: Application of Theory Paper and Reflection C3. b,c &d
Ass
Individual Assignment: Application of Theory Paper and Reflection C3. b,c &d
Assignment Purpose
Nursing theories play a vital role in the evolution of nursing as a discipline. They establish the critical contributions made by the profession and provide nurses with frameworks to guide their practice, grow professionally, and improve the care they deliver to patients. This assignment focuses on the importance of nursing theory within the profession. Selecting one nursing theorist and the middle-range theory they developed (non-nursing ideas are not allowed), the student will present a summary of the set nursing theory, identify opportunities for the application of the theory to a nursing situation (In this course, you have analyzed a middle range theory, you may the theory used in previous discussions). The student will include two scholarly peer-reviewed sources to support the nursing theory chosen.
Requirements
The two central aims of this assignment are to apply a middle-range nursing theory to clinical practice and to reflect on the experience. Consider the problem described in discussion nine. Write a paper (1,000 to 1,500 words, Approximately three pages) that explains how middle-range theory can be applied to the identified problem. The paper should include the following:
A summary of the problem (nursing situation). Describe a nursing situation you have encountered in your clinical placement. The situation can be a specific physiological patient problem or a case involving a vulnerable patient’s family or a staff member. It can also describe your role in problem-solving or an ethical issue you encountered in practice. The key is you need to have been directly involved in the event. You must also maintain the confidentiality of your subjects at all times. Do not identify the patient, staff, or hospital site.
A descriiption of a middle-range theory that could be applied to the problem. Is this middle-range theory appropriate to your identified situation? For example, health promotion, especially preventive care, is essential for ethnic minority groups and
the economically disadvantaged. The Health Promotion Model (HPM) (Pender, 1996; Pender et al., 2010) is a framework for delivering nursing care to support health promotion behaviors. An essential component of a nursing assessment is understanding personal factors (e.g., lack of finances to afford health insurance) and an individual’s perception of the benefits and barriers of engaging in health promotion behaviors. Screening recommendations and health promotion practices can be tailored to the patient’s and family’s cultural values and beliefs, finances, and community support when working with vulnerable populations.
A brief discussion of the middle-range theory’s origins includes a short biography of the theorist and the main concepts of the middle-range theory ( See discussion nine).
Discuss how the middle-range theory has been previously applied ( See discussion nine ).
A discussion of the application of the middle-range theory to the identified problem. How would your practice change by incorporating this theory?
The paper should be 2-3 pages, excluding the title and reference pages.
The paper should start with an introductory paragraph that includes the purpose statement.
Use headings and subheadings to organize the paper.
Reflection
Using the diagram below, reflect on the following questions:
Think about a nursing situation (necessary experience).
Consider the selected theory or parts theory while it is implemented in your nursing care.
As you apply theory, identify your emotions.
Have you experienced this nursing situation before applying the theory
What did I learn from completing this experience?
How have I been changed by what I’ve learned?