You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.
Please read
Complete the assigned readings, including the Case Study: West Flor
Please read
Complete the assigned readings, including the Case Study: West Florida Regional Medical Center. Type the case study questions and your responses into an initial thread, including references
LINK for the Case:
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781284003956/pageid/31
3 References in APA format including the case study source
CASE ANALYSIS
This is a hospital with a large group of physicians closely tied to it, both economically and geographically. It is also operating in an area of intense competition and tight cost controls. The fact that 90% to 95% of the hospital’s compensation is case-based (DRGs) and not procedure-based has a profound impact on management motivation. Intense support for the CQI implementation was provided by Dr. Batalden and his staff at HCA corporate headquarters.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS
1. What were the strategic reasons behind West Florida Regional Medical Center’s (WFRMC’s) decision to invest heavily in TQM?
2. How did the program undertaken at WFRMC reflect this strategic impetus?
3. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the TQM program as it was implemented here?
4. What were the influences of corporate headquarters in this effort? 5. What effort has been made to measure the impact of the program
on the hospital, especially in terms of supporting its strategic directions?
6. What effort has been made to use TQM to support tactical pro-grams within the hospital?
7. What should John Kausch do next in dealing with continuous improvement?
8. If West Florida Regional Medical Center was to introduce an inter-nal medicine residency program, how would the concepts of microsystems be incorporated into its current quality efforts?
Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their
Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.
Explain and interpret for stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.
Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.
Summarize a proposed organizational policy or practice change guideline and analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.
Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform healthcare laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.
Explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.
Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.
Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.
Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.
Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
1. in 1000 -1500 words in detail, write a written clinical details objective for
1. in 1000 -1500 words in detail, write a written clinical details objective for MedSurg acute care settings that are measurable and show progression in nursing care… involving all care performed and all disease process,
2.Detailed Reflection logs for care provided on the MedSurg floor including the nursing process by Nanda
Clinical site is at UF health florida,6s pavilion MedSurg
detailed learning in clinicals setting on a MedSurg floor
No reference needed, all are personal experience and learning that was done during clinical hours on the MedSurg floor
https://video.alexanderstreet.com/p/ywXz8gWBn
Download the Comprehensive Psychia
https://video.alexanderstreet.com/p/ywXz8gWBn
Download the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. Also review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar to see an example of a completed evaluation document.
By Day 1 of this week, select a specific video case study to use for this Assignment from the Video Case Selections choices in the Learning Resources. View your assigned video case and review the additional data for the case in the “Case History Reports” document, keeping the requirements of the evaluation template in mind.
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
Identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient.
Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
Reading:
McGonigle & Mastrian – Ch. 5, 8 and 12
After reading assigned chapters
Reading:
McGonigle & Mastrian – Ch. 5, 8 and 12
After reading assigned chapters, students will reflect on an ethical/moral dilemma surrounding healthcare informatics that could utilize the Ethical Decision-making Framework in the textbook Box 5-1 (4th ed., pp. 262-269). Keep in mind that informatics is an extremely broad area so there are many actual issues that nurses may have encountered or will encounter soon.
1. All post should include your last name and the name of the student you are responding to in the discussion.
2. Students will post a brief explanation of the dilemma and how it has affected nursing practice (300- 500 words). (50 points)
a. What must be decided to address the ethical dilemma?
b. Who should be involved in the decision-making?
c. What policies are in place within the workplace surrounding the dilemma?
d. Demonstrate socially responsible leadership by making a list of practical solutions and predict the consequences for each the best and worst. (3 minimum-5 max solutions)
e. Pick one solution from d and use the Ethical Decision-making Framework Box 5-1 to support your decision.
3. Students will then choose a dilemma posted by another student and use the Ethical Decision-making Framework (4th ed., pp. 262-269) to: (25 points)
a. Make a persuasive argument why the solution was unreasonable or reasonable and support this argument with one or more scholarly sources for each solution. For example, a principle, policy, or legal implication.
Use APA 7th edition formatting
Attached is rubric, APA reference manual, and textbook for reading reference
First, review the full scenario and associated data in the Assessment 03 Supplem
First, review the full scenario and associated data in the Assessment 03 Supplement: Disaster Recover Plan [PDF] Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Disaster Recover Plan [PDF]resource
Develop a disaster recovery plan for the community that will reduce health disparities and improve access to services after a disaster.
Assess community needs.
Consider resources, personnel, budget, and community makeup.
Identify the people accountable for implementation of the plan and describe their roles.
Focus on specific Healthy People 2020 goals and 2030 objectives.
Include a timeline for the recovery effort.
Apply the MAP-IT (Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track) framework to guide the development of your plan:
Mobilize collaborative partners.
Assess community needs.
Use the demographic data and specifics related to the disaster to identify the needs of the community and develop a recovery plan. Consider physical, emotional, cultural, and financial needs of the entire community.
Include in your plan the equitable allocation of services for the diverse community.
Apply the triage classification to provide a rationale for those who may have been injured during the train derailment. Provide support for your position.
Include in your plan contact tracing of the homeless, disabled, displaced community members, migrant workers, and those who have hearing impairment or English as a second language in the event of severe tornadoes.
Plan to reduce health disparities and improve access to services.
Implement a plan to reach Healthy People 2020 goals and 2030 objectives.
Track and trace-map community progress.
Use the CDC’s Contract Tracing Resources for Health Departments as a template to create your contact tracing.
Describe the plan for contact tracing during the disaster and recovery phase.
Develop a slide presentation of your disaster recovery plan with an audio recording of you presenting your assessment of the scenario and associated data in the Assessment 03 Supplement: Disaster Recover Plan [PDF] Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Disaster Recover Plan [PDF]resource for city officials and the disaster relief team. Be sure to also include speaker notes.
Presentation Format and Length
You may use Microsoft PowerPoint (preferred) or other suitable presentation software to create your slides and add your voice-over along with speaker notes. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your instructor to avoid potential file compatibility issues.
Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:
Title slide.
Recovery plan title.
Your name.
Date.
Course number and title.
References (at the end of your presentation).
Your slide deck should consist of 10–12 content slides plus title and references slides. Use the speaker’s notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and cite your sources as appropriate. Be sure to also include a transcriipt that matches your recorded voice-over. The transcriipt can be submitted on a separate Word document. Make sure to review the Microsoft PowerPoint tutorial for directions.
Answer the following questions in a response that is 250 words maximum:
1. Comme
Answer the following questions in a response that is 250 words maximum:
1. Comment on the issues that your peer described. For example, were the issues accurate?
2. How well did they describe how the issue(s) was/were handled?
3. Describe another issue that is evident in the article.
4. At least two in-text citations/references (in addition to the article under discussion) are needed for the response post. References must be from those included.
Discussion Post to respond to:
Health Promotion in an Opioid Treatment Program: An Evidence-Based Nursing Quality Improvement Project
Quality improvement focuses on unit and organizational processes that impact outcomes, analyzing performance, compliance measures, and nursing metrics to address specific local performance gaps (Ogrinc et al., 2013; Raines, 2012). The main question the author sought to answer was how to efficiently assess and improve the health of clients in opioid treatment programs at a large, not-for-profit community health center located in an urban area (Gadbois et al., 2016). The project’s objectives were to create a comprehensive health assessment tool to identify healthcare needs, improve and evaluate nursing participation in systematic health assessments, and establish procedures for agency follow-up on identified healthcare needs (Gadbois et al., 2016).
The article addressed the ethical concerns of nursing staff not documenting patient health problems, initiating referrals, or performing medication reconciliation for patients, citing electronic health record difficulties and time constraints (Gadbois et al., 2016). Staff violated the ethical principle of beneficence and potentially non-maleficence as patients did not receive the needed referrals, comprehensive care based on individual health history, and potentially correct medications. A new referral and shared documentation system was implemented due to the quality improvement project. Additionally, providers enrolled in a statewide prescription monitoring program so providers and pharmacists could view controlled prescriptions a patient had received for the past year. Furthermore, a nurse care coordinator position was created to coordinate healthcare and promote health (Gadbois et al., 2016).
The article also addressed the issue of health equity. It cited literature on disparities in preventative care and care related to chronic conditions among minority and poor populations compared to the general public (Gadbois et al., 2016). The article cited that the patient population was multicultural, and the community had high rates of unemployment and homelessness. Additionally, many patients did not have a primary care provider listed or adequate dental care, and many had untreated medical problems (Gadbois et al., 2016). In response, the mental health practice gained licensure to add an ambulatory healthcare clinic to provide patients with preventative care, treat chronic conditions, and address untreated or undiagnosed medical conditions (Gadbois et al., 2016). The project team also researched Medicaid dental benefits, and Medicaid coverage information was provided to nursing staff regarding dental care (Gadbois et al., 2016).
References
Gadbois, Christine DNP, RN-BC, CDDN, CBIS, APHN-BC; Chin, Elizabeth D. PhD, RN, ANP; Dalphonse, Lee CAGS, LMHC, NCC, CCMHC, LCDS, ICCDP-D. Health Promotion in an Opioid Treatment Program: An Evidence-Based Nursing Quality Improvement Project. Journal of Addictions Nursing 27(2):p 127-142, 4/6 2016. | DOI: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000124
Ogrinc, G., Nelson, W. A., Adams, S. M., & O’Hara, A. E. (2013). An instrument to differentiate between clinical research and quality improvement. IRB., 35(5), 1–8.
Raines, D. A. (2012). Quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and nursing research . . . oh my! Neonatal Network, 31(4), 262–264. https://doi.org/10.1891/0730-0832.31.4.262Links to an external site.
Criteria that must be met in response:
-All questions must be answered.
-Response must be accurate, specific, and addressed criteria for evaluation of the posting.
-Offer suggestions for improvement.
-Evidence of critical thinking.
– Writing is clear and well-organized. Spelling and grammar correct. APA format is used consistently and reference list.
Please follow uploaded instructions and use the intended state of practice as Oh
Please follow uploaded instructions and use the intended state of practice as Ohio to answer the questions
Week 6
Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies
Assignment
Purpose
The purpos
Week 6
Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies
Assignment
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide education to clients on the use of the selected wearable technology in health and wellness.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 2: Demonstrate how current and emerging information and communication technologies are utilized to address the needs of a diverse population. (POs 3, 4)
CO 5: Apply ethical, legal, regulatory, and professional standards to the use of information systems and communication technologies. (POs 2, 6)
Total Points Possible
This assignment is worth 175 points.
Preparing the Assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
Directions:
Complete the Part 3: Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies template, following the steps below.
Download the Part 3: Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies templateLinks to an external site. Use of this template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. See the rubric.
Save the template and include your name in the file name.
To complete the template, use the wearable technology device, population, and health condition you selected in the Week 3 Part 1: Examining Wearable Technologies assignment.
On the template, click into each [Text Box] that contains the client education to include. Remove the words [Text Box] and answer the questions.
Please use a combination of full sentences and bullet points within the template, keeping in mind the chosen population and health condition/health behavior.
Do not change the font size. Ensure the font color is black and your answer fits within the box.
Use information from the previous assignments and at least two external scholarly sources of evidence from the Chamberlain Library to complete the template for educating clients on the chosen wearable technology.
To add an image to the template, save the image to your device. Select Insert > Pictures > This Device. Select the image and click Insert.
Provide APA in-text citations for all listed references. Reference sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references. The required scholarly sources should come from the Chamberlain Library and should include the full APA reference plus the permalink.
Follow grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with professional writing.
Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail. A combination of complete sentences and bullet points may be used.
Safety Precautions and Appropriate Use
Provide education on:
Safety precautions
Appropriate usage of the device
Possible limitations
Features and Functions
Provide education on:
Core function
Additional features
Potential benefit
Interoperability
Provide education on:
How the device communicates with other healthcare applications
The advantages of data sharing
Privacy settings
Device Maintenance
Provide education on:
Maintenance
Software updates
User information
Troubleshooting
Provide education on:
Common issues
How to troubleshoot issues
How to get user support
Photos
Insert a photo of the chosen wearable technology onto the first page of the brochure.
Insert a photo of the chosen wearable technology onto the second page of the brochure.
Photos are appropriate and maintain the format of the brochure.
Format
Answer all questions/criteria with explanation and detail appropriate to the assignment.
A minimum of two scholarly sources with permalinks from the Chamberlain Library are used.
Answers are written using professional language.
Scholarly sources pertain to the topic and are no more than five years old unless they are historical references.
Removes [Text Boxes], uses the proper font, and maintains the template format.
Citation and Reference Formation
Use the current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.
Writing Requirements
Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.