Category: Nursing homework help

For this RCT critical appraisal assignment, you will complete an appraisal of t

For this RCT critical appraisal assignment, you will complete an appraisal of the following article=: 
Here is a link to the article:    A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness in patients with schizophrenia Download A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness in patients with schizophrenia
Respond to this prompt following rubric guidelines as posted:
1- State your overall appraisal of this article (include/exclude/seek further info) and provide a rationale of approximately 2-3 paragraphs, citing evidence from the article, as to why you think the article is appropriate to include or not in the making of a clinically-based decision.  This will be your response to the final question on the CASP RCT Checklist.    
2-  Complete the CASP RCT Checklist  Download CASP RCT Checklist critical appraisal tool and use this information to guide your final thoughts on the usefulness of this article.  Be sure to provide examples and support for your responses.  Please do not simply answer “yes” or “no”.  
3-  Describe at least 1 important point that you learned about the appraisal process as a tool that is used before the findings from a study could be applied to clinical practice.

 Based on your assigned readings and lecture materials this week, engage with y

 Based on your assigned readings and lecture materials this week, engage with your peers and me by initiating a thread or responding to another peer’s thread or one of my threads. You should post a minimum of three times.
Is there something you are learning this week that you are excited about?
Can you apply any of the concepts this week to the career you are interested in pursuing?
Do you have any questions about the concepts you are learning this week?
You are not required to initiate a thread, however,  There is no minimum or maximum word count. You will be graded on the relevance of your post to the topic and the application of the concepts.
When responding to your peers, you should extend, refute/correct, or add additional nuance to their posts. 
All replies must be constructive and follow proper netiquette. Click here to go to the Academic Continuity Guide for Students and read the Course Communication Guidelines (Netiquette)

Read rubric verbatim
 What to Submit
Your submission should include a 2- to 3-p

Read rubric verbatim
 What to Submit
Your submission should include a 2- to 3-page Word document with your reflection, as well as your completed Module Two Decision Analysis Worksheet. For the reflection, include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Draft of Script for PowerPoint Presentation:Ferrous Sulfate Medication
Draft a

Draft of Script for PowerPoint Presentation:Ferrous Sulfate Medication
Draft a script of how you plan to narrate your PowerPoint presentation.
 The presentation voiceover/script must include information about the:
Drug pharmacology, pharmacokinetics
Brand name
Generic name
Dosing
Indications for use
Side effects
Contraindications
Pregnancy class
You must also perform a cost analysis of the drug.
Provide a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug.
Describe the appropriate patient education. 
What is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation?
Describe the monitoring and follow-up.
Bibliography, and outline will be attached. 

Speak in first Person
 
Then, respond to at least two of your peers’ initial po

Speak in first Person
 
Then, respond to at least two of your peers’ initial posts. Include the following in your response:
Identify at least one other source of funding that your peer did not identify, and explain why that source is also important to consider in planning a program.
Explain the risks of not creating or including a budget as part of a program plan. If your peer has already discussed some risks in their initial post, identify at least one other risk they did not identify or elaborate further on a risk they did identify.

Read rubric verbatim
 What to Submit
Your submission should include both your c

Read rubric verbatim
 What to Submit
Your submission should include both your completed Proposed Program Budget Template Excel and a 2- to 3-page Word document with your reflection. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Identify and describe the problem in clear and concise language. To help you

Identify and describe the problem in clear and concise language. To help you think about what problem you might choose, keep in mind the health or nursing problems of the patient population(s) you currently serve, those you encountered in your clinical courses, or those you plan to work with in the future.
Describe the clinical setting.
Describe the service area for the clinic and population groups who attend the clinic services.
What kinds of problems do you see in the clinic?
Give a clear, explicit statement of the problem and target population, as well as the background of the specific problem relative to the clinical setting.
Is it broad enough that you can analyze it from many theoretical and conceptual points of view and make suitable plans to address the problem from a number of perspectives?
Is it of enough interest to you that you are willing to spend most of the semester thinking about it, assessing all its dimensions, planning in detail how to address it, and designing a detailed intervention and evaluation plan?
Describe the significance of the evidence-based project that could be implemented in the selected setting to the nursing profession. Ask yourself why it is important to you. Consider your own clinical interest.
Describe clinical observations that point out the knowledge gap, clinical gap, etc.
Describe the significant research in the area that has been done that delineates the gap in our knowledge.
should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages. Must reference a minimum of 3 scholarly sources.
THIS IS PART TWO OF TWO PART ASSIGNMENT. DUE DATES ARE DIFFERENT BUT ASSIGNMENT TOPICS NEED TO BE THE SAME. 

 My assigned disease process is   Condition:  Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD)
Follow

 My assigned disease process is   Condition:  Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD)
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. 
General Instructions 
The purpose of this discussion is to examine an assigned disease process and determine which disease process explored in the discussion Bayani, the client, is experiencing. Follow the instructions below and your faculty member will reveal which disease process Bayani is experiencing at the end of the discussion week. 
Step 1: Review the following client scenario: 
Bayani, a 62-year-old male client, presents to the NP with abdominal pain with his wife. Bayani is mildly confused, and according to his wife, he is normally fully oriented. His abdomen is soft and non-distended, and his wife states he has been urinating and drinking more water than usual. She also states he has had foul-smelling urine and is concerned he also has a urinary tract infection. 
 
Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. 
Discuss the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of your assigned disease process. Which clinical manifestations observed in Bayani’s case could be explained by the pathophysiological mechanisms? 
Analyze Bayani’s clinical manifestations in the context of your assigned disease process. Do these findings support a diagnosis of your assigned disease process? Why or why not?  
Identify and justify the diagnostic tests (including labs, imaging, or other diagnostic tests) that would be most appropriate for investigating a diagnosis of your assigned disease process in Bayani. What could the results of these tests look like in your assigned disease process? 
Compare and contrast your response with a peer assigned a different condition. Does their condition fit Bayani’s case? Why or why not? 

describe one reading that relates most closely to your project topic and how th

describe one reading that relates most closely to your project topic and how this microsystem will help you develop your change project.
Go here: https://clinicalmicrosystem.org/knowledge-center/workbooks
Then review “inpatient workbook” 
Chose reading to discuss. 
THIS IS PART ONE OF A TWO PART ASSIGNMENT. TOPICS MUST MATCH. THIS IS DUE EARLIER. 
this one is 2-3 paragraphs with APA sources. 

Compare and contrast the operation of negative and positive feedback mechanisms

Compare and contrast the operation of negative and positive feedback mechanisms in maintaining homeostasis. Provide two examples of variables controlled by negative feedback mechanisms and one example of a process regulated by a positive feedback mechanism.