Read and answer each of the questions for review on page 52. You will write at
Read and answer each of the questions for review on page 52. You will write at least one paragraph for each one.
book link https://plus.pearson.com/courses/677a04bcaccf0638594fed0e/pages/ab336480-db63-11ec-8978-07e2c352cac5
The login details will be available for the assigned writer
Overall Feedback
Very good. Very well written look at protecting civil libertie
Overall Feedback
Very good. Very well written look at protecting civil liberties even in times of crisis. Well written. A few typos, though (in red)
Instructions
In this assignment, you will craft a research paper on a homeland security issue. In the prior assignment, you presented the first three sections of your paper. This week, you will add the final sections and present the full paper. Be sure to make any changes to your literature review based on instructor feedback.
The three main sections you should add to the paper for this submission are the Methodology and Research Strategy, the Analysis and Findings section, and the Conclusions/Recommendations section.
Methodology and Research Strategy: This section provides the reader with a description of how you carried out your qualitative research project and the variables you identified and analyzed. It describes any special considerations and defines any limitations and terms specific to this project, if necessary. If you use any data, you will identify the data and its source. This section can be brief or more complicated, depending on the project, written in 1-2 pages.
Analysis and Findings: Analysis and findings are not the same as conclusions. In the analysis component of the paper, you identify how you analyzed the data. The second part is the finding you got from your analysis of the data. The findings are the facts that you developed, not your interpretation of the facts. That interpretation is conducted in the conclusions and recommendations section of the paper. Findings will come from the prior research you examined and your analysis of those prior findings to create new findings for your paper. This section should be at least 2-5 pages.
Conclusions and Recommendations: is the section where you give your interpretation of the data. Here you tell the reader what the findings mean. Often the conclusions and recommendations sections will mirror the findings in the construct as the researcher tells the reader what the researcher sees as the meaning of that data. Then, drawing on those conclusions, the researcher tells the reader what they believe needs to be done to solve/answer the research question. This section may include recognition of any needs for further research and then finishes with a traditional conclusion to the paper as a whole.
Remember, your paper should seek to answer a question that helps to solve the research puzzle you identified.
Technical Requirements
Your paper must be a minimum of 10-15 pages (the title and reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit). This limit includes the earlier sections of the paper completed in the first assignment. Please be sure to read the instructor feedback and incorporate any recommendations for improvement.
Scholarly and credible references should be used. At least 8 scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
Scholarly sources include peer-reviewed articles, government publications, and academic texts.
Type in Times New Roman, 12 point, and double space.
Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic-type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.
This week’s discussion brings our focus to the dynamic evolution and strategic d
This week’s discussion brings our focus to the dynamic evolution and strategic development of the United States’ National Counterintelligence (CI) Strategy. Our exploration delves deep into the strategic initiatives, policy frameworks, and evolving methodologies that underpin the formulation and adaption of this crucial CI strategy. Through an insightful examination of the historical trajectory, key principles, and contemporary adaptations, we aim to dissect the multifaceted layers that shape and drive the development of CI strategy at the national level. Join us in this exploration as we unravel the strategic underpinnings and adaptive measures that fortify the United States’ National Counterintelligence Strategy.
After reviewing Lesson two, and the required reading and video for the week, discuss the historical shaping forces (technology, war, political dynamics, terrorism, economic, religion, social) that have affected the development of the United States’ Counterintelligence (CI) National Strategy, each focusing on different aspects, please respond to one of the following:
(1) Historical Shaping Forces in CI Strategy: Analyze the historical forces, such as technological advancements, warfare, political dynamics, terrorism, economic shifts, religion, and social changes, that have influenced the formulation and evolution of the United States’ strategic counterintelligence strategy at the national security level.
(2) Changes in CI Strategy Over Two Decades: Examine the shifts and adaptations in the U.S. counterintelligence strategy over the past 20 years. How have changing threat landscapes, emerging technologies, and geopolitical developments shaped the evolution of this strategy during this period?
(3) Evolving Threats and CI Strategy: Delve into how evolving threats, including cyber threats and espionage, have necessitated adjustments in the U.S. counterintelligence strategy. How has the strategy adapted to address contemporary challenges while safeguarding national security interests?
Please review the current US National Counterintelligence Strategy of 2023 before posting your response.
Make sure to include information from our required material for the week in your discussion.