Category: Criminal Justice

  • Directions: Using the following link (https://www.biography.com/people/groups/se

    Directions: Using the following link (https://www.biography.com/people/groups/se

    Directions: Using the following link (https://www.biography.com/people/groups/serial-killers), select one serial killer case to answer the below questions.
    Answer/Discuss the Following:
    Describe the case you selected to include the personal history of the serial killer, the facts of the case, and how the killer was eventually identified (less than two pages).
    Discuss the killer’s crime scenes and any patterns identified during the investigation. Describe why the patterns were significant to the investigation. Did investigators identify these patterns and use them to further their investigation?
    Identifying two significant items of evidence recovered during the investigation and discussing why each item was so important and how it could have, or did, lead to the killer’s identity.
    Discuss the investigation and identify two deficiencies in the investigations that lead to the individual continuing their crimes. Discuss how these deficiencies could have been avoided or overcome.
    Discuss two modern forensic, technological, or database advances, if in existence at the time of the killings, could have been used to catch the killer earlier on in the investigation.
    Format Requirements
    Paper must be double-spaced, 11 or 12-point font, and 1 ”margins.
    All APA 7th edition format requirements must be followed (cover page, in-text citations, reference page). Refer to APA/UMGC – learning resources can be found on the content page of this course.
    You must have resources to support your thoughts/opinions/information.  These must be cited both in the text and at the end of the document. Your paper should not contain direct quotes, and the sourced material must be paraphrased.

  • In a two-page report, describe Shaw and McKay’s work on social disorganization t

    In a two-page report, describe Shaw and McKay’s work on social disorganization t

    In a two-page report, describe Shaw and McKay’s work on social disorganization theory and collective efficacy (refer to the Week 2 readings). Explain why you think it lost its appeal in the 1960s but generated renewed interest in the 1980s. The assignment should be 2 pages, 12-point Times New Roman, and double-spaced. All ideas should be addressed in well-developed paragraphs. Within the assignment, reference key concepts in the course, as well as course readings. Cite sources in APA style.
    Formatting
    Style: Your report should be written in well-developed paragraphs.
    Length: Your report should be 2 pages in length. Points will be deducted for papers that exceed the specified length (see rubric below for more details).

  • Essay #1: Develop an essay on the development of morality. Who has the greatest

    Essay #1: Develop an essay on the development of morality. Who has the greatest

    Essay #1: Develop an essay on the development of morality. Who has the greatest influence on your moral development? Why? How? Why do you think people behave in ways that hurt others? Have you ever done something that you knew was wrong? Why did you do it? Essay must be a minimum of 300 words.

  • Design a project to help track down missing persons. In the past missing persons

    Design a project to help track down missing persons. In the past missing persons

    Design a project to help track down missing persons. In the past missing persons’ pictures were posted on milk cartons so that everyone who was drinking milk could be alerted to the status of that person. Now, there are often postings in local stores and websites designed to help find missing persons.
    You are going to design your own unique way of alerting people about missing persons. Using a word document or a PowerPoint presentation, design your own way to help the people that have gone missing be found. Be creative, use facts to help you design your missing person’s alert system, and explain why your system will be successful.

  • Part A: Defining the following terms: 1. Normative Ethics 2. Ethical Relativism

    Part A: Defining the following terms:
    1. Normative Ethics
    2. Ethical Relativism

    Part A: Defining the following terms:
    1. Normative Ethics
    2. Ethical Relativism
    3. Cultural Relativism
    4. Ethical Absolutism
    5. Ethical Pluralism
    Part B
    Term 1
    e
    Students:
    Please read and explain the concepts mentioned above in your own words and provide an example of how they are relevant in daily life.

  • Discussion 1 Please answers the following questions in a few sentences! 1. What

    Discussion 1
    Please answers the following questions in a few sentences!
    1. What

    Discussion 1
    Please answers the following questions in a few sentences!
    1. What is Ethics?
    2. Why do we have Ethics?
    3. Define the following terms and also give a real-life example of each, to wit:

    Morals
    Duties
    Values
    Wholesight
    4. What are some of the ethical decisions you make daily?
    5. What are Braswell et al.’s (2008) five goals in understanding ethics in criminal justice?
    6. What is the most essential ethical challenge or concern in criminal justice today?
    7. Please briefly summarize the student’s intention for enrolling in this class. This summary should not exceed three to five sentences.
    Acquainting Yourself with Ethics
    You are on patrol and stop a vehicle for expired registration. You approach the driver and notice it is an old friend from school. You give a verbal warning to her and tell her she is free to go. Before leaving, she says it was great to see you again. She asks if you want to get coffee sometime and hands you her phone number.
    1. Would letting her go without issuing a citation be ethical?
    2. Is it appropriate for a police officer to agree to have coffee with an old friend?
    3. Would it be considered unethical for a police officer and an old friend to exchange phone numbers?
    Power and Discretion to Arrest
    You are a police officer working the night shift, but you still have a few hours to go and are looking for some caffeine to help you push through the remainder of your shift. You stop at the local store on your beat for some coffee, and a man, who you later learn is the owner, tells you that coffee is now free for all law enforcement; because of how tired you are, you gladly oblige. Over your next few shifts, you visit this store to get coffee. Around a month later, you are about to finish your last shift before a long-awaited vacation when you notice a vehicle making erratic movements ahead of you. You decide to stop the individual and, as you approach the car, realize it is the store’s owner. Upon questioning, you know he is severely intoxicated. He says he notices you from his store and pleads with you that he cannot afford to go to jail as his business will certainly suffer. Conflicted by how charitable he has been to you in the past, you decide to drive him home instead of arresting him.
    Which type of corruption (hedonistic or obligatory) does the officer engage in?
    Would this scenario be an example of the warning by Goldstein that accepting small gratuities is often the beginning of a “slippery slope of moral career?”
    How can you help with this situation?

  • You are taking over for writer that caused me to fail. View week 1 paper where h

    You are taking over for writer that caused me to fail. View week 1 paper where h

    You are taking over for writer that caused me to fail. View week 1 paper where he chose a topic and started my research paper. Each week I submitted parts of my paper that needed to be built upon with instructions from Professor. Edit week 2 paper to Professors critique. Do not do anything with week 1 paper but view it to catch up. I ask that writer that is able to complete this order and do a good job continues with the rest of my orders as I will be submitting more parts of the paper to be edited. I will be uploading week 1 paper to view so writer can pick up where other writer left off, week 2 to be corrected from other writers mistakes and Professors corrections that she wants made. For week 2 corrections writer will also need to view Kaltura Live (seminar) dated Jan 20 on school website to understand changes Professor wants made.
    Billups: Chapter 2
    Papers must be done in correct sequence or they will be wrong. For example 1,2,3,4,5 etc

  • INSTRUCTIONS Course: Criminology Essay instructions: Answer the following quest

    INSTRUCTIONS
    Course: Criminology
    Essay instructions:
    Answer the following quest

    INSTRUCTIONS
    Course: Criminology
    Essay instructions:
    Answer the following question in essay style.
    1. Question:
    Outline the key aspects of what statistics can and cannot contribute to our understandings of crime. Detail the pitfalls of data collection practices and explain four difficulties/sensitivities that make it difficult to accurately measure crime statistically. For each difficulty/sensitivity, provide multiple examples and at least one detailed example. In addition, use the example of sexual violence on campus to analyze the ways in which victim blaming and sexism in particular can play a role in the underreporting of violence/crime.
    ESSAY SPECIFICATIONS
    Your essay must include the following:
    o Introduction: A couple of introductory sentences
    o Body of paper: Paragraphs clearly answering every part of the question
    o Conclusion: Summary, opinion
    The essay should not exceed 6-8 pages in length (roughly 1700- 2000 words), not including the title page and bibliography.
    The essay must be written in 12-point, Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins.
    DO NOT INCLUDE A TITLE PAGE
    Citations and Bibliography has to be in APA style.
    Author for the slides is (Allspach, 2025)
    Please use the slides and attached papers. No outside research is required.
    The last part of the question refers to the documentary The Hunting Ground by Kirby Dick. Please make sure to watch the documentary.
    MARKING CRITERIA
    You will be evaluated according to the following criteria:
    Your detailed theoretical knowledge;
    Definition and explanation of key concepts;
    How well you apply theories and key concepts to the topic/examples; and
    Structure and organization of essay and clarity of writing.
    The 5 sources are the 4 attached files and 1 documentary.
    Please follow all instructions or else marks will be taken off and may result in a zero.

  • Please critique student’s paper on things she should have discussed or should no

    Please critique student’s paper on things she should have discussed or should no

    Please critique student’s paper on things she should have discussed or should not discussed. Compliment where it’s necessary. Please use course texts as sources.

  • Identify a criminological relationship of interest to you involving both an inde

    Identify a criminological relationship of interest to you involving both an inde

    Identify a criminological relationship of interest to you involving both an independent and
    dependent variable. For example, one of the criminological relationships of interest in the Brunson
    and Weitzer (2009) “featured researcher” article is the relationship between race and youths’
    attitudes toward police.
    You may select a topic from either (a) the research areas of the 6 scholars profiled in Chapter 1 of the
    Rennison text or (b) the topic areas in NIJ’s now defunct “Five Things” series (listed next page).
    Because the articles you select for this assignment must come from one of the journals in the
    Journal Guide (on Canvas), you are strongly encouraged to pursue these sources to refine your
    relationship of interest. This is the relationship that you will use throughout this project, so please
    choose carefully.